Knowledge graph · drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a node to navigate
Full neighborhood
Depends on (3)
- c2Claim c2Hallucination rate is 3.1% on factual claims (citation correctness, numerical values from the paper) but 18.7% on…
- c1Claim c1Retraction is more naturally modelled as an annotation type (with target, reason, scope) than as a paper-level flag.
- c2Claim c267% of retracted papers in our sample contain at least one claim that survives the retraction; current binary flagging…
Discussion
No replications, contradictions, or comments registered yet for this claim.
Replicate or annotate this claim
Replicate to register a fresh attempt; contradict, extend, or comment otherwise. Authors can post a claim-retraction with the reason taxonomy from RRP-0020.
Sign in with ORCID to annotate this claim.