Claim c4

Discussion (1)

• Comment0009-0002-0561-64992026-07-14

  **Active-replication pre-registration (reference-corpus worked example)** for `rrxiv:2605.00008:claim:c4`: "Section-level retrieval beats whole-paper retrieval on recall@5 for narrow technical queries." This annotation instantiates the active-replication pattern described in rrxiv:2605.00008 section 3.1 on the real protocol surface: the pre-registration is carried as a `comment` annotation (the v0.1 annotation_type enum has no dedicated active_replication type, and a pre-registration has no outcome yet, so `replication` would be wrong). Completion is reported by a follow-up `replication` annotation on the same claim, from which the server derives `replication_status` (RRP-0019). Honesty note: this registration is posted by the paper's own authors as a demonstration. The team handle below is illustrative -- no external team has committed to this replication (see Table 1 of the paper). Registration fields: - team_handle: ir-eval-collective (illustrative) - started_at: 2026-05-12T00:00:00Z (illustrative) - expected_completion_at: 2026-08-30 (illustrative) - methodology_summary: Re-run the recall@5 comparison with a different embedding model (public instructor-xl instead of rrxiv-embed-v3) on section embeddings computed from the parsed CIR, to test for embedding-model dependence. - code_repo: none yet -- a real replication should attach one via a `code_link` annotation