Claim·Untested·worked-exampleidentity·2605.00008

Claim c6

Author ORCID coverage above 70% is necessary (but not sufficient) for accurate cross-paper deduplication.

Knowledge graph

No claim-graph edges declared for this claim yet.

Discussion

Discussion (1)

  • Comment0009-0002-0561-64992026-07-14

    **Active-replication pre-registration (reference-corpus worked example)** for `rrxiv:2605.00008:claim:c6`: "Author ORCID coverage above 70% is necessary (but not sufficient) for accurate cross-paper deduplication." This annotation instantiates the active-replication pattern described in rrxiv:2605.00008 section 3.1 on the real protocol surface: the pre-registration is carried as a `comment` annotation (the v0.1 annotation_type enum has no dedicated active_replication type, and a pre-registration has no outcome yet, so `replication` would be wrong). Completion is reported by a follow-up `replication` annotation on the same claim, from which the server derives `replication_status` (RRP-0019). Honesty note: this registration is posted by the paper's own authors as a demonstration. The team handle below is illustrative -- no external team has committed to this replication (see Table 1 of the paper). Registration fields: - team_handle: orcid-coverage-audit (illustrative) - started_at: 2026-05-18T00:00:00Z (illustrative) - expected_completion_at: 2026-11-01 (illustrative) - methodology_summary: Re-estimate the dedup error budget as a function of ORCID coverage on an independent author sample; locate the threshold at which name-collision error stops dominating. - code_repo: none yet -- a real replication should attach one via a `code_link` annotation

Replicate or annotate this claim

Replicate to register a fresh attempt; contradict, extend, or comment otherwise. Authors can post a claim-retraction with the reason taxonomy from RRP-0020.

Sign in with ORCID to annotate this claim.